Name and Describe the Five Roles That Psychologists Can Play in the Legal System

Fundamental decisions in the psychological study of law  No decision on these decisions will be entirely satisfactory, because no decision can achieve two irreconcilable objectives at the same time  The first choice: the rights of the individual versus the common good o Conflicting values  Individuals have rights and the law is designed to ensure the protection of those rights  Freedom and personal autonomy are two of our values the most expensive in the United States. A psychologist working in public policy can suggest legislation or help evaluate a new legal practice (e.g., eyewitness statements). [6] The role of forensic psychology is to explore the elements of criminal intent. In any criminal trial, the accused must have the necessary mindset to be convicted of all elements of a crime. In other words, most crimes contain an “intent” requirement that limits the guilty verdict to the accused who decided to commit the crime before committing the crime. This area may become controversial in some cases where the accused may have suffered from mental illness at the time of the offence, preventing him or her from forming the necessary intent. You raise so many good points here that I have read your article several times. Their views largely coincide with mine. This is great content for your readers. Calgary Psychologists Psychologists can provide the court with an amicus curia letter.

The American Psychological Association provided information sessions on mental illness, delay and other factors. The amicus curiae letter usually contains an opinion supported by scientific citations and statistics. The effect of an amicus curiae briefing by a psychological association is questionable. For example, Justice Powell[8] once referred to reliance on statistics as “numerology” and rejected the results of several empirical studies. Judges with no formal scientific training may also criticize experimental methods, and some are of the view that judges cite an amicus curiae brief only if the brief supports the judge`s personal convictions. A preliminary question in any criminal case is whether the accused has the mental capacity to stand trial and face his accuser. A forensic psychologist is often chosen to conduct an assessment of the accused`s skills, according to Psychology.org. The task of forensic psychologists is to determine whether the defendant will be able to consult with his lawyer, maintain a reasonable level of understanding of the proceedings, or assist in his or her defence. I read your message and it sounds amazing.